We examine how scientific language shapes perception, treatment, and policy — particularly for individuals living with rare diseases and conditions — and how it can reinforce or dismantle ableism.
An initial literature review revealed several important insights:
- Tension between disability models: Ongoing conflict between the medical model (focused on fixing conditions) and the social model (focused on removing systemic barriers).
- Contrasting language frameworks: Biomedical research often uses deficit-based language, while disabled communities emphasize identity, autonomy, and lived experience.
- Need for community-centered research: People living with rare diseases are rarely asked how they want to be described—highlighting a critical gap this project aims to address.
We want to hear from you. Your experiences with the words used to describe your health, your body, and your community matter.
This study is exploring how language in research and healthcare can be more respectful, more accurate, and more just.
Thank you! The Rethinking Language in Science survey is now closed. We are deeply grateful for the overwhelming response to this project. In just a short time, our community stepped forward and shared their experiences, far beyond what we expected. Your voices will help shape how healthcare providers, researchers, technologists, and policy makers talk about disability and rare disease. Thank you for trusting us with your stories.
To learn more about upcoming interviews, surveys, focus groups and to stay in the loop about upcoming RLIS efforts, please complete this brief interest form.
Have questions? Contact the research team at: research@namedadvocates.org